Does “Readily Achievable” Mean Optional?

Marc Perlof • September 21, 2026

By Marc Perlof | @MarcRetailGuy
CA #01489206


September 21, 2026


If you own retail real estate, here’s what just changed for you.


Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) risk is not only about lawsuits and CASp reports. It is also about what can actually be corrected at the property. For California retail property owners, the phrase that matters is “readily achievable.”


In plain English, readily achievable means certain accessibility barriers may need to be removed when the work can be done without much difficulty or expense. That does not mean every older retail property must be rebuilt from scratch. It also does not mean an owner can ignore the issue because the building has been that way for years.


The real question is practical: what can be fixed, who should fix it, what will it cost, and how could the issue affect the property’s value?


Why Readily Achievable Repairs Matter

Many retail owners hear “ADA” and assume the issue will be expensive, complicated, and impossible to manage. Sometimes it can be. But not every ADA issue requires a major rebuild.


Some items may be smaller and more manageable. Examples may include signage, striping, door hardware, restroom accessories, threshold issues, counter access, parking markings, or path of travel items. Other issues may be more complex, especially when slopes, restrooms, ramps, structural conditions, or site layout are involved. The point is not that every repair is simple. The point is that owners should understand which issues are manageable and which issues may require a larger plan.

That knowledge matters because uncertainty can become expensive. If an owner does not know what needs to be fixed, a buyer, tenant, attorney, or plaintiff may define the problem for them. That usually puts the owner in a weaker position.


Does Year Built Matter?

Year built can matter, but owners should not rely on age alone. Older retail properties may have more accessibility issues because parking, restrooms, entrances, slopes, counters, and paths of travel may not match current standards. But newer properties can still have problems if work was done incorrectly, tenant improvements changed the layout, parking was restriped, restrooms were altered, or access routes were modified.


The better question is not only, “When was the property built?” The better question is, “
What is the current condition of the property today?” A property can be old and still have manageable issues. A property can be newer and still have compliance problems. Owners should avoid assumptions.


Common Retail Property Areas That May Create ADA Risk

For retail properties, readily achievable repairs often show up in customer facing areas such as parking, access aisles, signage, paths of travel, entrances, doors, restrooms, service counters, seating areas, and common areas. The key issue is not just where the problem is located. The key issue is whether the repair is practical, who controls the area, and whether the lease shifts any responsibility to the tenant.


Before making repairs, the owner should understand the property condition, the tenant’s use, the lease language, and the likely cost. Some items may be simple. Others may require design, permits, tenant coordination, or a larger plan.


How Readily Achievable Repairs Affect Value

Readily achievable repairs affect value because they can turn unknown risk into known cost. If an owner identifies a $10,000, $20,000, or $35,000 issue before a sale, the owner can make a decision. Repair it. Budget for it. Disclose it. Price it. Negotiate around it. Get professional advice on the proper path.


But if the issue appears during escrow with no plan, the buyer may assume the risk is larger than it really is. That can lead to a larger price reduction, repair credit, holdback, longer due diligence period, or stronger seller protections. In some cases, the buyer may use the issue to renegotiate the deal. This is the value problem. The repair cost may be one number. The buyer’s fear may be a much larger number. For retail owners, the goal is to avoid letting someone else turn a manageable repair into a major pricing issue.


How Repairs Can Affect NOI and Leasing

ADA repairs can also affect leasing and NOI. If a new tenant needs accessibility work before opening, the tenant may ask the landlord to complete the work, provide more TI money, give more free rent, reduce rent, or delay the rent commencement date. That affects income. If income is reduced, value may be reduced. For example, if unresolved accessibility issues cause the owner to give extra free rent or absorb improvement costs, the impact is not only the repair bill. It can also affect the lease economics and the property’s value.


This is especially important with restaurants, medical users, dental tenants, service tenants, franchise tenants, and other businesses that serve the public. A tenant may still lease the space. But if the owner has not evaluated accessibility issues early, the tenant may gain negotiation leverage.


What Retail Owners Should Do

Retail owners should take a practical approach.

  1. Identify the customer facing areas of the property. Look at parking, access aisles, entrances, doors, paths of travel, restrooms, counters, signage, and common areas.
  2. Review the lease. Understand what belongs to the landlord, what belongs to the tenant, and what may be shared.
  3. Get the right guidance before making decisions. ADA and California accessibility claims are technical. Owners should speak with an ADA attorney and qualified accessibility professional before ordering reports, making written statements, or starting repairs.
  4. Separate small fixes from larger issues. Some items may be manageable. Others may require design, permits, tenant coordination, or a larger budget.
  5. Think about value. The question is not only, “What does this repair cost?” The better question is, “What happens if this issue comes up during a lawsuit, lease negotiation, refinance, or sale?”


That is where small problems can become expensive.


Common Questions Retail Owners Ask

Does readily achievable mean optional?
No. Owners should not treat it as optional. It means the work may be required when it can be done without much difficulty or expense.


Does an older building get a free pass?

No. Older buildings may not need to be rebuilt from scratch, but owners should not assume age eliminates accessibility risk.


Should every issue be fixed immediately?

Not always. Owners should get proper legal and technical guidance, understand the priority, and create a controlled plan.


Final Thought

Readily achievable repairs matter because they connect ADA risk to real ownership decisions. For retail property owners, the goal is not panic. The goal is control. If the owner understands the issues early, the owner can decide what to repair, what to budget for, what to discuss with counsel, what to negotiate with the tenant, and what may affect value.


If you are unsure whether an ADA repair is a small fix or a larger value issue, I can help you look at how it may affect leasing, NOI, and sale risk.


If the owner waits until a lawsuit, tenant demand, buyer inspection, or escrow issue, the owner may have fewer options and less leverage. In next week’s blog,
“How ADA Risk Affects Retail Property Value, Leasing, and Sale Negotiations,” we will discuss how accessibility issues can affect pricing, buyer confidence, NOI, lease terms, escrow, and final net proceeds.


Based in Los Angeles. Serving Southern California. Active across California. Advising clients nationwide.


#RetailRealEstate #CommercialRealEstate #CaliforniaRealEstate #RetailPropertyOwners #ADACompliance #CASp #PropertyValue #CommercialProperty #MarcRetailGuy



Disclaimer

This post is for information only. It is not legal, tax, or financial advice. Always check with a licensed professional before making decisions.




© 2026 Marc Perlof Group. All rights reserved.


By Marc Perlof • November 6, 2026
CVS Health to split off its retail pharmacy business CVS Health is planning one of the largest corporate separations in history as it looks to separate its retail pharmacy operations from its insurance and pharmacy benefits business. The retail and healthcare giant, whose total revenues increased to a record high of $402.1 billion in 2025, intends to separate into two independent, publicly traded companies, with the split expected to be completed by the first half of 2028. The decision follows a “comprehensive strategic review by the CVS Health board,” the company said...
By Marc Perlof • November 2, 2026
By Marc Perlof | @MarcRetailGuy CA #01489206 November 2, 2026 If you own retail real estate, here’s what just changed for you. One of the biggest risks to a retail property is not always one owner making a bad decision. It is multiple owners failing to make a decision at all. When family members, business partners, or other co-owners delay action, the cost can show up through lost income, higher expenses, missed opportunities, weaker financing, or a lower sale price. Retail properties are often owned by siblings, spouses, business partners, LLC members, family offices, trusts, or investment groups. Each owner may have a different financial goal, timeline, and tolerance for risk. Disagreement is normal. The larger problem is having no clear process for turning disagreement into a decision. Even if you own the property by yourself today, these same decisions often become the responsibility of a spouse, children, successor trustee, or other heirs in the future. A clear decision process today can help prevent confusion later. What Do Multiple Owners Commonly Miss? Many ownership groups assume waiting is the safest choice when they cannot agree. They delay a lease decision, postpone repairs, wait to refinance, or hold off on selling until everyone feels comfortable. That may reduce conflict in the moment, but it does not stop the property from changing. Leases move closer to expiration. Deferred maintenance grows. Financing terms and buyer demand can change. Waiting may feel neutral, but its financial effect rarely is. Good properties are often held back by poor decision processes, not poor real estate. The issue becomes harder when each owner defines success differently. One partner may want monthly income. Another may want to sell and reinvest. One sibling may want to keep the property because it has been in the family for decades, while another may need cash for retirement or other obligations. None of these goals are automatically wrong. The ownership group still needs to decide which goal should guide the property’s current strategy. Why Do Ownership Groups Delay Important Decisions? Experience does not remove emotion, fear, or personal pressure. An owner may understand leasing and property values but still resist a sale because the property belonged to a parent. Another may reject a reasonable lease because the proposed rent is below what the space achieved years earlier. Another common reason for delay is the belief that retail property values will continue increasing over time. Many properties have appreciated over long periods, but that does not automatically make waiting the best financial decision. While ownership waits, leases age, capital needs grow, financing changes, and buyer demand shifts. A property’s future value depends on much more than appreciation alone. The better question is not, “Will this property be worth more someday?” It is, “Will waiting create a better overall financial result than acting today?” Owners may also delay because they want to avoid regret. They worry that selling now could mean missing a higher price later, or that completing an improvement could waste money. That fear can cause repeated delays while income, expenses, tenant risk, and market conditions continue to change. The goal is not to make a perfect decision. It is to make the best available decision based on the property’s current income, condition, financing, leases, marketability, and ownership objectives. How Can Indecision Affect Property Value? Property value is tied closely to income, risk, and buyer confidence. If ownership delays a lease renewal, buyers may underwrite more vacancy risk. If repairs are postponed, buyers may reduce pricing for future capital costs. If owners cannot agree on a sale strategy, the property may remain exposed to tenant rollover, changing financing conditions, or new competition. Indecision can also weaken negotiations. A tenant may recognize that the owners are not aligned. A buyer may question whether the group can approve terms, respond to due diligence, or close on schedule. A lender may require clear authority before moving forward with refinancing. The cost may not appear as one large loss. It often shows up through additional vacancy, higher repair costs, reduced leverage, lost rent, or a weaker offer. Over time, those smaller consequences can materially reduce value. What Should the Ownership Group Decide First? The first decision is not whether to sell, refinance, lease, improve, or hold. It is agreeing on the ownership group’s primary objective. Is the priority current cash flow, long term appreciation, preserving the property for the next generation, reducing risk, or preparing for a sale within a defined period? Once that objective is clear, the group can compare each option using the same standard. A lease proposal can be measured by its effect on NOI, flexibility, and value. A capital improvement can be evaluated based on cost, expected rent, tenant demand, and sale impact. A sale can be reviewed based on net proceeds, taxes, timing, and reinvestment options. Without a shared objective, every discussion becomes a debate over personal preferences. With a shared objective, the group can focus on what best supports the investment. Real Deal Insight I recently advised a family that owned a retail property through multiple siblings. One wanted to sell, another wanted to continue collecting income, and another wanted to wait because they believed the property’s value would continue increasing. Before discussing pricing or marketing, I helped the ownership group compare the financial consequences of each option, including projected income, future capital needs, lease rollover, holding costs, and the risks of delay. Once everyone reviewed the same information, the discussion shifted from individual opinions to the property’s investment objectives. That allowed the group to make an informed decision based on facts instead of assumptions. Strategic Advice for Retail Property Owners If your property has multiple owners, start by defining the group’s main investment objective and expected holding period. Each owner should understand whether the current goal is income, growth, preservation, redevelopment, refinancing, or sale. Then decide how major property decisions will be reviewed. The group should know who gathers the information, who has authority, what requires a vote, and how long the group has to respond. Governance and legal issues should be reviewed with the appropriate attorney, CPA, or other licensed advisor. The goal is not more meetings. It is a process that allows the group to decide before delay limits the available options. Owner Self-Assessment If your ownership group had to decide today whether to renew a major tenant, complete a capital improvement, refinance, or sell, would every owner agree on the property’s main objective and how the decision should be made? Final Takeaway Multiple owners do not need to agree on everything, but they need a clear process for making decisions before delay reduces income, options, or value. In next week’s blog, “The Hidden Cost of Waiting: How Decision Delays Reduce Property Value,” I will explain how indecision can affect lease negotiations, repairs, financing, buyer interest, and property value. If your retail property has multiple owners, I can help your group compare the financial impact of holding, leasing, improving, refinancing, or selling before indecision limits the available choices. The quality of a retail property’s decisions often depends less on the property itself and more on the process the owners use to make those decisions. Is your ownership group protecting the property by waiting, or is waiting quietly becoming the most expensive decision? Based in Los Angeles. Serving Southern California. Active across California. Advising clients nationwide. #RetailRealEstate #CommercialRealEstate #RetailProperty #PropertyOwners #FamilyPartnership #BusinessPartners #FamilyOffice #InvestmentProperty #ShoppingCenters #MarcRetailGuy
By Marc Perlof • October 30, 2026
Tractor Supply Q3 sales rise 5.1%; to moderate new store openings Tractor Supply Company delivered third-quarter earnings and sales that beat analyst expectations and said it was gaining share against most categories and metrics even as its customers remain cautious. On the company’s earnings call, CEO Hal Lawton said that elevated interest rates and reduced housing mobility are weighing on property improvements and larger projects. Pet ownership headwinds, particularly new pet acquisition, continue to affect demand in certain categories...
More Posts