When to Sell a Retail Property Without an Asking Price

Marc Perlof • May 18, 2026

By Marc Perlof | MarcRetailGuy 

CA #01489206

May 18, 2026

If you own retail real estate, here’s what just changed for you.


In some situations, removing the price can lead to stronger offers. This approach allows the market to determine value instead of limiting it upfront.


When used correctly, it can create competition and improve your outcome.


More retail properties are being marketed without a price. Brokers are using offer-driven strategies to let buyers compete based on their own assumptions.


What is causing it?

Differences in buyer expectations and uncertainty in valuation are driving this shift. In many cases, investors and developers value the same property differently, especially when there is upside or redevelopment potential.


How does removing the price affect your value?

Removing the price can eliminate the ceiling. Buyers are not anchored to a specific number, which can lead to stronger offers when demand is present.


When multiple buyers are involved, this approach can create competition and push pricing higher.


What is the risk?

If demand is limited, offers may come in below expectations. This often happens when the buyer pool is thin or when the property has uncertainty, such as a short lease term, tenant risk, or redevelopment challenges.


When should you use Request for Offers?

Use it when there is strong demand and the property is expected to attract multiple buyers. Even in these situations, active buyers and brokers will often ask for pricing guidance or a whisper price to understand where the seller expects the deal to trade.


When should you use a more flexible approach?

Use submit offers when you want flexibility and are testing the market. This approach allows you to respond to buyer feedback while still maintaining control of the process.


Some properties are marketed without a price because the broker does not have a clear view of value. That is not the same as a strategy. When used correctly, removing the price is intentional and supported by buyer demand, positioning, and a defined process. Without that structure, it can create confusion and weaker results.


We are seeing strong assets generate multiple offers with this approach, while weaker deals struggle to gain traction without pricing guidance.


This strategy is not about avoiding a price. It is about allowing the market to define it when the conditions support it.


If you need context, review
Part 2: “Should You List Your Retail Property With an Asking Price?”


In next week’s final article, read
“How Strategic Underpricing Can Increase Your Retail Property Sale Price” (Part 4), including one approach many owners overlook.


If you are considering an offer-driven strategy, reach out before going to market. I will help you determine if your property can support it and how to structure it properly.


Call or DM me for more information.


Would removing your price increase your value or create uncertainty?


Based in Los Angeles. Serving Southern California. Active across California. Advising clients nationwide.


#RetailRealEstate #CRE #InvestmentProperty #CommercialBroker #LosAngelesRealEstate #NNN #RetailInvesting #PropertySales


Disclaimer

This post is for information only. It is not legal, tax, or financial advice. Always check with a licensed professional before making decisions.




© 2026 Marc Perlof Group. All rights reserved.


By Marc Perlof • November 13, 2026
US inflation rose more than expected last month The cost of everyday necessities continued to climb in October, putting more pressure on Americans already struggling to keep up with grocery bills, housing costs and other household expenses. Consumer prices rose 0.4% from a month earlier, more than the 0.3% increase economists had anticipated, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics released Tuesday. Nearly a third of the overall increase in prices came from shelter costs, which include rent and other housing-related expenses...
By Marc Perlof • November 9, 2026
By Marc Perlof | @MarcRetailGuy CA #01489206 November 9, 2026 If you own retail real estate, here’s what just changed for you. Waiting is not a neutral decision. Every month an ownership group delays an important decision, the property's income, risk, financing, marketability, or value can change. The true cost of waiting usually becomes clear only after the opportunity has passed. Whether the property has one owner or several, delaying an important decision should be evaluated like any other investment choice because the financial consequences continue to change over time. Last week, I discussed why multiple owners often struggle to make timely decisions. This week, let's look at what that delay can actually cost. Why Do Owners Keep Waiting? Most ownership groups do not delay because they are careless. They delay because they believe waiting reduces risk. Some are waiting for interest rates to improve. Others are waiting for property values to increase. Some want to wait until a tenant renews. Others simply cannot reach an agreement. Each reason may sound reasonable on its own. The problem is that the property continues to change while ownership waits. What Changes While You Wait? Retail properties are not static investments. Leases continue moving toward expiration. Buildings continue to age. Deferred maintenance becomes more expensive. Financing markets change. Buyer demand shifts. Elections may also lead to changes in tax policy, regulations, public spending, or development rules that affect ownership decisions. Tenants open, close, expand, and relocate. Every month of delay changes the investment, even if nothing appears different from the street. The important question is not whether waiting changes the property. It almost always does. The important question is whether those changes improve or weaken your financial position. How Can Waiting Reduce Property Value? Many owners assume the property's value will eventually increase enough to offset the cost of waiting. Sometimes that happens. Sometimes it does not. For example, waiting another year may result in: A major lease moving closer to expiration. Higher repair or replacement costs. Less favorable financing. Increased vacancy risk. Lower buyer confidence. Missed redevelopment or repositioning opportunities. A higher property value does not automatically produce a better investment result if income falls, expenses rise, or risk increases along the way. The goal is to evaluate the entire financial picture, not just the future sale price. What Should Ownership Be Measuring? Instead of asking, "Should we wait?" Ask questions such as: What is the financial cost of waiting six months? What could improve during that time? What could become worse? What assumptions are we making? What evidence supports those assumptions? Those questions move the discussion away from opinions and toward measurable investment decisions. Real Deal Insight With the same ownership group mentioned in last week’s blog, one of the main questions was whether waiting would improve the financial result. One sibling believed more time could lead to a higher property value, while another was concerned about what could happen to the property during that waiting period. I helped the family compare the potential benefit of holding against projected income, lease rollover, future capital needs, holding costs, and the risks of changing market conditions. The question was not simply whether the property might be worth more later. It was whether waiting was expected to produce a better overall financial result after considering what could change along the way. Strategic Advice for Retail Property Owners Before deciding to wait, calculate what waiting is expected to cost and what it is expected to produce. Review upcoming lease expirations, projected capital improvements, financing, operating expenses, tenant stability, and market conditions. Then compare those factors against the potential benefits of delaying the decision. Waiting should be an intentional investment strategy, not simply the result of uncertainty or disagreement. Owner Self Assessment If your ownership group decides to wait another year before making a major property decision, can you clearly explain why waiting is expected to produce a better financial outcome? Final Takeaway Waiting is not free. Every delay has potential financial consequences that should be measured before the ownership group decides to postpone an important decision. Next week, in "When Multiple Owners Disagree: How Family and Business Partners Can Move Forward," I'll discuss why ownership groups reach deadlocks and how a structured decision making process can help move important property decisions forward. If your ownership group is deciding whether to hold, lease, refinance, improve, or sell, 1031 exchange, I can help you compare the financial consequences of acting now versus waiting before you commit to either path. Is your ownership group waiting because the numbers support it, or simply because no one is ready to decide? Based in Los Angeles. Serving Southern California. Active across California. Advising clients nationwide. #RetailRealEstate #CommercialRealEstate #RetailProperty #PropertyOwners #FamilyPartnership #BusinessPartners #FamilyOffice #InvestmentProperty #ShoppingCenters #MarcRetailGuy
By Marc Perlof • November 6, 2026
CVS Health to split off its retail pharmacy business CVS Health is planning one of the largest corporate separations in history as it looks to separate its retail pharmacy operations from its insurance and pharmacy benefits business. The retail and healthcare giant, whose total revenues increased to a record high of $402.1 billion in 2025, intends to separate into two independent, publicly traded companies, with the split expected to be completed by the first half of 2028. The decision follows a “comprehensive strategic review by the CVS Health board,” the company said...
More Posts