Should You Sell Now or Wait?

Marc Perlof • July 27, 2026

By Marc Perlof | MarcRetailGuy 

CA #01489206

July 27, 2026


If you own retail real estate, here’s what just changed for you.


Last week, we looked at how buyers actually evaluate retail properties. They look at income, leases, tenant quality, property condition, financing, future costs, and exit value. That brings us to the most important owner question in this series:
should you sell now or wait?


This is not a simple yes or no decision. For some retail property owners, selling now makes sense. For others, waiting may protect value. For others, the right answer may be to lease vacant space, clean up property records and title concerns, fix property issues, or refinance. The key is to make the decision based on numbers, risk, and timing. Not emotion.


The Wrong Way to Make the Decision

Many owners ask, “What price can I get?” That matters, but it is not enough.

The better question is: what is the best decision based on my property, family goals, income, risk, tax position, debt, and long term plans?


A property may be worth selling even if pricing is not perfect. A property may be worth holding even if the market is active. The right answer depends on the facts.

This is also where the owner’s tax and reinvestment plan matters. Selling and cashing out may create liquidity, reduce management, and simplify life, but capital gains taxes, depreciation recapture, and state taxes can reduce the net proceeds. A 1031 exchange may allow an owner to defer taxes and keep more equity working, but it also requires finding a replacement property, meeting exchange deadlines, and adjusting to the new lifestyle.


The real question is not just, “What price can I get?” It is, “What do I keep after taxes, what do I do with the money, and am I better off after the sale?”


When Selling Now May Make Sense

Selling now may make sense if the property has strong current income and a buyer pool that still wants the asset. This is especially true if the leases are long term, tenants are strong, income is clean, repairs are limited, the location is desirable, and the owner wants to simplify, exchange, reduce management, or avoid future rollover risk.


Selling now can also make sense when the property is not fully stabilized, but the lease structure creates flexibility for the right buyer. Short term leases may scare off passive investors, but they can attract value add buyers, syndicators, developers, or owner users who want the ability to raise rents, retenant space, reposition the property, or plan for redevelopment.


Timing matters. A property with 10+ years of lease term may price much better for a passive investor than the same property with 3 years left. But a property with short term leases, below market rents, or future redevelopment potential may appeal to a different buyer pool. The key is knowing whether the short term lease structure is a weakness, an opportunity, or both.


When Waiting May Make Sense

Waiting may make sense if the property is not ready. If an owner has below market rents and can increase them, waiting may create value. If a vacancy can be leased, waiting may improve Net Operating Income (NOI). If records are disorganized, waiting may allow the owner to clean up the file before going to market. If a repair issue is scaring buyers, addressing it first may protect pricing. Waiting may also make sense if selling creates a tax problem and the owner does not have a clear 1031 exchange plan. But waiting is not automatically safe. Waiting has risk.


The Risk of Waiting

Owners often think waiting is neutral. It is not. Waiting can help, but it can also hurt. Risks include tenant rollover, vacancy, rent collection issues, higher insurance costs, higher repair costs, capital improvements, interest rate changes, buyer demand changes, lending pressure, new competing listings, and local market changes.


Some owners also wait because they believe the market will feel clearer after an election, after interest rates move, or after major global uncertainty settles. That may be reasonable, but it is still a bet. Elections, wars, tax law changes, and economic shocks can affect buyer confidence, capital flow, lending, and pricing. The market may improve, stay flat, or get worse. Waiting should be based on a clear reason, not just the hope that uncertainty disappears. A property can look stronger today than it will in 3 to 12 months. That is why waiting should be a strategy, not a default reaction.


The Financial Question Sellers Should Ask

Before deciding to sell or wait, owners should ask: what needs to happen for waiting to create more value? For example, assume a retail property has $250,000 of NOI and could sell today at a 6.50% cap rate. That value is about $3,846,154. If the owner waits and increases NOI to $275,000, but the market later prices the property at a 6.75% cap rate, the value is about $4,074,074. That is an increase of about $227,920. That may sound good, but the owner still needs to consider how much money was spent to create the higher NOI, how long it took, whether there was vacancy risk, whether tenant improvements and/or free rent were required, and whether market risk increased during the wait. Sometimes waiting creates value. Sometimes it creates more work for a small net gain.


Selling Now Versus Leasing First

Selling now with vacancy may attract value add buyers. The price may be lower, but the owner avoids leasing time, tenant improvement costs, commissions, carrying costs, contractor issues, delays, and the risk of choosing the wrong tenant.


That has its own value. Sometimes accepting a lower price and transferring the value add work to the buyer is smarter than spending months dealing with leasing, construction, negotiations, permits, and uncertainty. For those owners, peace of mind can have real internal value, even if it does not show up as a line item on the closing statement.


Leasing first may increase NOI and attract more buyers, but the owner needs to invest time and money before selling. The question is not just whether leasing increases value. The question is whether leasing increases value enough after costs, time, and risk.


Selling Now Versus Fixing Issues First

Some repairs should be handled before going to market. Others should be disclosed and priced into the deal. It depends on the issue. If a smaller repair removes a major buyer objection, it may be worth doing. If a larger repair is expensive and uncertain, the owner may choose to sell as is to a buyer who understands the work. Common items to review include roof, HVAC, parking lot, plumbing, electrical, ADA, environmental, structural issues, and deferred maintenance.


The goal is not to make the property perfect. The goal is to avoid surprises that create price cuts during escrow.


Selling Now Versus Refinancing

Some owners do not really want to sell. They want cash or liquidity. In that case, refinancing may be an option. But refinancing only works if the numbers support it.

The owner needs to review current NOI, loan amount, interest rate, debt service coverage, loan costs, prepayment penalty, future cash flow, property risk, and their current lifestyle. If refinancing creates tight cash flow, selling may still be the better decision. If refinancing gives the owner liquidity and allows them to keep a strong asset, holding may make sense.


The Decision Should Be Based on Net Outcome

Owners should not only ask, “Can I get a higher price later?” They should ask: will I be better off later after time, cost, taxes, risk, and effort? Sometimes the highest price is not the best outcome. A clean sale today may be better than chasing a slightly higher price with more risk. Other times, waiting 3 to 12 months may be smart if there is a clear path to improve income or reduce buyer concerns. The decision has to be specific to the property.


Final Thought

The question is not always, “Is now the perfect time to sell?” There is rarely a perfect time. The better question is, “What decision puts you in the strongest position moving forward?”


For some owners, that means selling now. For others, it means waiting. For others, it means leasing, fixing, refinancing, cashing out, or completing a 1031 exchange. The real risk is not selling or waiting. The real risk is making either decision without understanding how buyers, lenders, taxes, lease rollover, future repairs, and market timing affect the outcome. This concludes the Execution and Decision-Making series. The main takeaway is simple: understanding pricing is important, but execution, timing, and decision making determine the result.


If you are trying to decide whether to sell, wait, refinance, cash out, complete a 1031 exchange, or lease first, I can help you review the numbers and risks before you make a move.


Based in Los Angeles. Serving Southern California. Active across California. Advising clients nationwide.


#RetailRealEstate #CommercialRealEstate #RetailInvestment #PropertyOwners
#RetailPricing #PricingStrategy #HoldorSell #CREStrategy #MarcRetailGuy



Disclaimer

This post is for information only. It is not legal, tax, or financial advice. Always check with a licensed professional before making decisions.




© 2026 Marc Perlof Group. All rights reserved.


By Marc Perlof September 7, 2026
By Marc Perlof | @MarcRetailGuy CA #01489206 September 7, 2026 If you own retail real estate, here’s what just changed for you. Why ADA Risk Matters Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) risk can affect a retail property owner even when the tenant operates the business. For California retail properties, accessibility issues can lead to lawsuits, settlements, Certified Access Specialist (CASp) reports, repair obligations, lease disputes, buyer concerns, and lower property value if the risk is not managed. The biggest issue is not always the cost of the repair. The bigger issue is uncertainty. Buyers, tenants, lenders, and attorneys may use unresolved ADA concerns to ask for credits, repairs, holdbacks, price reductions, or stronger lease protections. For retail owners, the goal is simple: understand the risk before a lawsuit, tenant, buyer, or lender uses it against you. Why ADA Risk Matters to Retail Property Owners Most retail property owners do not think about ADA risk until something creates pressure. That may be a lawsuit, a tenant complaint, a buyer question during due diligence, a lender request, a CASp inspection, or a repair demand. By that point, the owner is usually reacting instead of controlling the issue. This matters because ADA risk is not only a legal issue. It is also an ownership, leasing, and value issue. A retail owner may face legal costs, settlement costs, repair costs, tenant conflict, delayed closings, buyer discounts, or disclosure concerns. This year, I saw ADA issues come up on separate retail properties. Once the claims surfaced, the owners had to deal with attorneys, settlement discussions, CASp reports, and property updates. That is when ADA risk stopped being theoretical. It became a real ownership issue with real costs, real deadlines, and real value impact. The mistake many owners make is assuming the tenant is responsible for everything. That may or may not be true. The lease matters. The property condition matters. The location of the issue matters. The type of tenant matters. The owner’s control over common areas matters. The history of prior improvements also matters. In other words, ADA risk is not always simple. What ADA Risk Looks Like in a Retail Property Retail properties are exposed because customers use the property in many ways. They park, walk to the business, enter the space, move through the property, use restrooms, approach counters, and sit in dining or waiting areas. Accessibility issues may involve parking stalls, access aisles, paths of travel, ramps, sidewalks, entrances, doors, restrooms, service counters, signage, slopes, seating areas, or common areas. Some issues may be inside the tenant’s premises. Other issues may be in areas controlled by the landlord. Some may involve shared areas used by multiple tenants. Some may have existed for years without a complaint. That does not always mean the issue goes away. For owners, the practical questions are: What accessibility issues exist? Who controls the area? Who is responsible under the lease? What can reasonably be corrected? What is the cost? How could this affect value? These are ownership questions, not just legal questions. Is ADA the Tenant’s Responsibility or the Landlord’s Responsibility? This is one of the biggest questions retail owners ask. The honest answer is: it depends. A tenant may be responsible for its own operations, furniture layout, fixtures, counters, interior improvements, and customer service areas. But a landlord may still have exposure, especially if the issue involves the property itself or common areas controlled by the owner. This is why the lease matters. A strong lease should address compliance, maintenance, repairs, alterations, tenant improvements, common areas, indemnity, and legal claims. But even a strong lease may not stop a claim from being made against the owner. The lease may help determine who pays, but it may not prevent the owner from being pulled into the issue. The tenant may operate the business, but the owner still owns the property. How ADA Risk Can Affect Retail Property Value ADA risk affects value because buyers do not only underwrite income. They also underwrite risk. A buyer looking at a retail property may ask whether there have been ADA lawsuits, settlements, CASp reports, unresolved repairs, tenant complaints, or prior accessibility claims. They may also ask whether the property has accessible parking, a clear path of travel, proper signage, accessible entrances, and restrooms that fit the tenant use. If the answers are unclear, the buyer may price in uncertainty. That can reduce value. The repair cost may be manageable. The uncertainty may not be. A buyer may not know whether the issue costs $10,000, $50,000, or $150,000. When buyers do not know the number, they often assume a larger number to protect themselves. That is how a repair issue becomes a pricing issue. A buyer may ask for a price reduction, repair credit, escrow holdback, longer due diligence period, legal review, updated reports, or stronger seller representations. In some cases, the buyer may use the issue to renegotiate the deal. In other cases, the buyer may decide the risk is not worth it. This is the “so what” for the property owner. Unmanaged ADA risk can reduce leverage. Reduced leverage can reduce value. How ADA Risk Can Affect Leasing ADA issues can also affect leasing. A new tenant may require accessibility improvements before opening. A franchise tenant may have stricter standards. A restaurant may care about parking, seating, restrooms, service counters, and path of travel. A medical or dental tenant may care even more because patients may include older customers or people with mobility limitations. If the property has unresolved accessibility issues, the tenant may ask for landlord work, tenant improvement money, free rent, rent reductions, a longer due diligence period, or lease protections. The owner may still complete the lease. But the deal may become more expensive. That affects Net Operating Income (NOI). If NOI is reduced, value may be reduced. What Retail Property Owners Should Do Retail owners should not panic. They should get organized. Review the areas customers actually use. This may include parking, access aisles, paths of travel, entrances, doors, ramps, restrooms, counters, signage, and common areas. Review the lease. The owner should understand who is responsible for compliance, repairs, common areas, tenant improvements, legal claims, and indemnity. Consider whether a CASp inspection makes sense. This may be especially important before a sale, refinance, major lease negotiation, tenant turnover, or if there are obvious access issues at the property. Get proper legal and accessibility guidance. ADA and California accessibility claims can be technical. Owners should not rely only on guesses, tenant comments, broker opinions, or internet searches. Think about value. The question is not only, “What will this cost to fix?” The better question is, “What could this cost if it shows up during a lawsuit, lease negotiation, refinance, or sale?” Being proactive is smart, but it should be done carefully. Owners should not rush into inspections, written statements, or repairs without first speaking with an ADA attorney and a qualified accessibility professional. The goal is not to create a report with no action plan. The goal is to understand the risk and make controlled decisions. Final Thought ADA risk is not just a tenant problem. It can affect the owner, the lease, the tenant relationship, the buyer pool, the sale process, and the value of the asset. For retail property owners, the goal is not fear. The goal is control. If the owner understands the issue early, the owner can plan, budget, negotiate, repair, disclose, or address the risk before someone else uses it as leverage. If you own a retail property with public access, I can help you review how ADA risk may affect leasing, buyer questions, and future sale value before it becomes a negotiation problem. In the next week’s blog, “CASp Reports and Retail Property Value: What California Owners Should Know,” we will discuss what a CASp report can reveal, why timing matters, and how knowing the issues early can help protect a retail property owner’s leverage. Based in Los Angeles. Serving Southern California. Active across California. Advising clients nationwide. #RetailRealEstate #CommercialRealEstate #CaliforniaRealEstate #RetailPropertyOwners #ADACompliance #CASp #PropertyValue #CommercialProperty #MarcRetailGuy
By Marc Perlof September 4, 2026
Global bond yields fall after Fed governor says he may back holding rates steady Bond yields around the world fell Thursday, after Federal Reserve board of governors member Christopher Waller said he would support holding interest rates steady if economic conditions warrant it. “If there is continued progress toward our 2 percent goal, then I am willing to support holding the policy rate at its current level,” Waller said Thursday at the Reuters NEXT Newsmaker event in Washington, D.C...
By Marc Perlof August 28, 2026
Fed’s preferred inflation gauge shows core prices rose 3.3% annually in July Prices consumers pay for a variety of goods and services rose slightly in July, according to the Federal Reserve’s main inflation gauge.  The personal consumption expenditures price index, which the Fed uses as its preferred forecasting tool, increased a seasonally adjusted 0.2% for the month, putting the annual inflation rate at 3.7%, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday. Both were 0.1 percentage point above the Dow Jones consensus...
More Posts